Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 76
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $433,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bruce Martin Farms LLC | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,598 |
42 | Frankie Knapp | Gideon, MO 63848 | $1,393 |
43 | Ellis Ray Sapp | Parma, MO 63870 | $1,278 |
44 | Helen Bernice Landers - Helen Bernice Landers Rev | Gideon, MO 63848 | $839 |
45 | , | $807 | |
46 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $708 |
47 | Hayden Scott Riley | Bernie, MO 63822 | $546 |
48 | Louise Gardner Living Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $522 |
49 | Carolyn Kay Dell | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $494 |
50 | Ryan Scott Wilson | Portageville, MO 63873 | $443 |
51 | , | $373 | |
52 | Patricia K Scherer | Saint Louis, MO 63129 | $339 |
53 | Vickie Lynn Jackson | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $317 |
54 | Brenda Bizzell | Statesboro, GA 30458 | $301 |
55 | Adam Wayne Farrenburg | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $285 |
56 | Jessie L Sullenger | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $280 |
57 | Cheryl Lynn Wolford | Matthews, MO 63867 | $276 |
58 | Clay Cope | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $247 |
59 | Deborah Renee Hewes | Three Rivers, MA 01080 | $217 |
60 | Rice Farms | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”