Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 159
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $223,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,121 |
42 | Bock Bros Timber | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,072 |
43 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,061 |
44 | Weeks Harvesting Co., LLC | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $1,009 |
45 | Missouri Grain & Warehouse Inc | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,002 |
46 | Jennings Planting Co | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $982 |
47 | Ricky Parker Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $971 |
48 | Craig Hunter Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $965 |
49 | Curators Of The University Of Mo | Portageville, MO 63873 | $908 |
50 | Palmer Gang Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $879 |
51 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $856 |
52 | Kevin Carlisle Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $809 |
53 | Chris & Candace Sutton Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $758 |
54 | Jayne Family Farm | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $720 |
55 | Virginia Lee Copeland | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $707 |
56 | Patrick Carlson | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $698 |
57 | Boyer Leasing Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $694 |
58 | William Leslie Henry | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $681 |
59 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $614 |
60 | Hjp Farms Inc | Portageville, MO 63873 | $592 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”