Conservation Reserve Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 74
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $363,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Derek B Hayes | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,627 |
42 | Adam T Hayes | Marston, MO 63866 | $1,627 |
43 | Dewitt Development LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,575 |
44 | Milus Gary Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,512 |
45 | Wanda Harlene Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,512 |
46 | James Lee Haines | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,482 |
47 | W V Riley Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,425 |
48 | Meredith Dewitt Revocable Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,272 |
49 | Wilkinson Investments, LLC | Forsyth, IL 62535 | $1,245 |
50 | Kendig Farms Lp | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $1,237 |
51 | Kenneth Poos | Highland, IL 62249 | $1,180 |
52 | Rone & Simpson Partnership | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,122 |
53 | Johnston Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,092 |
54 | Savell Heirs Partnership | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,038 |
55 | Renfrow Revocable Trust | Melbourne, FL 32940 | $1,037 |
56 | , | $933 | |
57 | Howard C Tillman Rvoc Tr | Portageville, MO 63873 | $600 |
58 | Triangle Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $592 |
59 | Lindsey Wilburn | Ballwin, MO 63021 | $567 |
60 | Albert Riley James | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $539 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”