Market Loss Assistance Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,474
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $33,220,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | L Walls Farms Inc | Matthews, MO 63867 | $127,245 |
42 | Barry Richardson Sr | Marston, MO 63866 | $126,740 |
43 | Feezor Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $125,043 |
44 | J R Blankenship | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $124,975 |
45 | Mary Lou Medlin | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $124,628 |
46 | Bracey Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $124,148 |
47 | Rone Farm Partnership | Portageville, MO 63873 | $122,765 |
48 | Grape Ridge Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $122,616 |
49 | G & L Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $122,006 |
50 | Gerald Woolverton Revocable Livin | Malden, MO 63863 | $121,702 |
51 | G D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $121,406 |
52 | Taylor Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $121,284 |
53 | Mike Flynn Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $121,267 |
54 | Henry George Retz | Catron, MO 63833 | $117,674 |
55 | Earnest Lee Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $117,261 |
56 | Bobby David Lowrey Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $116,959 |
57 | Paul Farrenburg | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $116,723 |
58 | Michael Geske | Matthews, MO 63867 | $116,256 |
59 | Robert A Riley Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $116,140 |
60 | Randy Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $115,808 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”