Farm Subsidy information
New Madrid County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 251
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $12,110,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $10,099 |
62 | Missouri Delta Medical Center Foundation | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,977 |
63 | Kay S Schuerenberg Family Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,975 |
64 | Michael Girvin Rone II | Portageville, MO 63873 | $9,587 |
65 | Tonya Jones Powell | Portageville, MO 63873 | $9,222 |
66 | Jha Family Ltd Partnership | Nashville, TN 37221 | $9,048 |
67 | Donald F Underwood Sr Residuary Tr U-a-d 3-09-2005 | Portageville, MO 63873 | $8,709 |
68 | Laura Leigh Underwood | Portageville, MO 63873 | $8,671 |
69 | Wanda Underwood Trust | Portageville, MO 63873 | $8,634 |
70 | Earnest Lee Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $8,022 |
71 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $7,258 |
72 | Joshua Brea Nowell | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $7,091 |
73 | , | $7,091 | |
74 | Stoffer Farms LLC | Dallas, TX 75214 | $6,512 |
75 | Triple D Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $6,265 |
76 | Alta Pete Inc | Gideon, MO 63848 | $6,161 |
77 | Stephanie J Earnheart | Malden, MO 63863 | $5,740 |
78 | Mark Joseph Brands | Portageville, MO 63873 | $5,556 |
79 | , | $5,502 | |
80 | , | $5,467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”