Total Emergency Relief Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 194
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $3,543,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Richard T Weeks | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $12,129 |
62 | Danny Wayne Parker | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $11,457 |
63 | , | $11,073 | |
64 | Francis Wayne Delisle Iv | Dexter, MO 63841 | $10,729 |
65 | Laura Leigh Underwood | Portageville, MO 63873 | $10,398 |
66 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $10,298 |
67 | Cindy Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $10,028 |
68 | Parker Cotton Company Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,980 |
69 | J & S Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $9,875 |
70 | Spencer Earl Lemings | Gideon, MO 63848 | $9,543 |
71 | Josh Underwood | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $9,413 |
72 | Anthony Richard Scherer | Portageville, MO 63873 | $9,359 |
73 | Baldwin Farms Inc | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $9,300 |
74 | Palmer Gang Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $9,195 |
75 | Drew Aaron Underwood | Portageville, MO 63873 | $9,042 |
76 | Mark Kimes | Portageville, MO 63873 | $8,835 |
77 | Richard And Cynthia Faulkner Dba R & C Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $8,522 |
78 | Earnest Lee Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $8,162 |
79 | Hal Hunter Jr Irrevocable Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $7,961 |
80 | Hawes Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,552 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”