Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 316
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $766,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Alta Pete Inc | Gideon, MO 63848 | $2,715 |
62 | Edwards Family Investments LLC | Bethesda, MD 20816 | $2,649 |
63 | Kathryn Elizabeth Mitchell | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,587 |
64 | Robert Lee King, II | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,569 |
65 | First Missouri Bank Of Semo ** | Kennett, MO 63857 | $2,481 |
66 | Albert Riley James | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,461 |
67 | Grant St. Cin | Gideon, MO 63848 | $2,435 |
68 | Combs Farming Co | Kennett, MO 63857 | $2,368 |
69 | Gary D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $2,334 |
70 | Alliance Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,264 |
71 | Randy Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $2,258 |
72 | Virgil W Lawfield | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $2,256 |
73 | Derek Wayne Lawfield | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,239 |
74 | Toni Lynne Lawfield | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,239 |
75 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,225 |
76 | Tim Murphy Farms LLC | Bernie, MO 63822 | $2,145 |
77 | Christopher Toby Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,102 |
78 | Kelli Leigh Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,102 |
79 | , | $2,090 | |
80 | Mark Baker | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”