Farm Subsidy information
New Madrid County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 464
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $15,759,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Delouri Farms Inc | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $11,026 |
82 | Francis Wayne Delisle Iv | Dexter, MO 63841 | $10,729 |
83 | Laura Leigh Underwood | Portageville, MO 63873 | $10,398 |
84 | Missouri Delta Medical Center Foundation | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $10,288 |
85 | Parker Cotton Company Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,980 |
86 | J & S Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $9,875 |
87 | Steve Parker Farms LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,723 |
88 | Ricky Parker Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,676 |
89 | Anthony Richard Scherer | Portageville, MO 63873 | $9,648 |
90 | Palmer Gang Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $9,315 |
91 | Tonya Jones Powell | Portageville, MO 63873 | $9,222 |
92 | Hal Hunter Jr Irrevocable Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $9,161 |
93 | Brown Brothers Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $9,088 |
94 | Peter Lawrence Whitten | Matthews, MO 63867 | $9,056 |
95 | Jha Family Ltd Partnership | Nashville, TN 37221 | $9,048 |
96 | Drew Aaron Underwood | Portageville, MO 63873 | $9,042 |
97 | Hbr Ag | Charleston, MO 63834 | $8,956 |
98 | Mike Flynn Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $8,742 |
99 | Cindy Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $8,741 |
100 | Josh Underwood | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $8,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”