Counter Cyclical Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,725
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $58,545,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Richardson Gin Inc | Marston, MO 63866 | $177,948 |
82 | New Madrid Co Fms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $176,632 |
83 | John D Hux Jr - John & Ann Hux Family Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $173,304 |
84 | Billy W Harris | Matthews, MO 63867 | $171,867 |
85 | Mark E Ellis | Portageville, MO 63873 | $171,571 |
86 | Robt Fowler Fms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $169,380 |
87 | Wub Riley Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $168,812 |
88 | C G Scott Jr | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $166,332 |
89 | Danny Wayne Parker | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $164,408 |
90 | Albert Riley James | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $163,251 |
91 | Teddy Glen Landers | Parma, MO 63870 | $162,849 |
92 | Jack Tolbert | Gideon, MO 63848 | $159,842 |
93 | Mark Robertson | Malden, MO 63863 | $159,477 |
94 | Timothy Wayne Martin | Bernie, MO 63822 | $157,079 |
95 | L Walls Farms Inc | Matthews, MO 63867 | $156,627 |
96 | Steven Wayne Landers | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $153,585 |
97 | Joseph Burge | Malden, MO 63863 | $152,850 |
98 | Josh Underwood | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $151,860 |
99 | Randy Hulshof | Portageville, MO 63873 | $151,077 |
100 | Brown Brothers Farms | Kennett, MO 63857 | $150,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”