Farm Subsidy information
New Madrid County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 251
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $12,110,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Edwards Family Investments LLC | Bethesda, MD 20816 | $3,912 |
102 | Medlin Farms LLC | Bethesda, MD 20816 | $3,912 |
103 | Harry H Lewis | Nixa, MO 65714 | $3,827 |
104 | , | $3,770 | |
105 | , | $3,690 | |
106 | Anthony Richard Scherer | Portageville, MO 63873 | $3,539 |
107 | Jessie & Carolyn Sullenger LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $3,487 |
108 | Jacob Gaylon Mccurry Knapp | Gideon, MO 63848 | $3,439 |
109 | , | $3,438 | |
110 | Jw Sullenger Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $3,328 |
111 | , | $3,262 | |
112 | , | $3,215 | |
113 | Quincy Murphy Inc | Bernie, MO 63822 | $3,175 |
114 | C H Parsons Jr | Dexter, MO 63841 | $3,175 |
115 | Daniel Austin Eddy | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $3,173 |
116 | Clarence Wesley Crumpecker Jr | Kansas City, MO 64113 | $3,154 |
117 | Dean And Kathie Stevens Farms LLC | Malden, MO 63863 | $3,108 |
118 | Donald Ray Hastings II | Matthews, MO 63867 | $3,076 |
119 | D R Schaffer | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $3,010 |
120 | Richard Andrew Weeks | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $2,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”