Market Loss Assistance Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,474
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $33,220,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Charles Anthony Beis III | Portageville, MO 63873 | $66,636 |
142 | French Land Co | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $66,423 |
143 | Timothy G Coppage | Matthews, MO 63867 | $66,033 |
144 | Richard L Bell Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $65,555 |
145 | Christopher Toby Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $65,499 |
146 | Medlin Children Trust | Memphis, TN 38120 | $65,150 |
147 | Bob Lowrey Farms - Old | Dexter, MO 63841 | $64,585 |
148 | Jack Tolbert | Gideon, MO 63848 | $64,429 |
149 | Lange Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $64,338 |
150 | Tim Sisk | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $63,887 |
151 | Donald Rone Jr | Portageville, MO 63873 | $63,520 |
152 | Daniels Brothers Farm | Matthews, MO 63867 | $63,456 |
153 | Donald Ray Hastings II | Matthews, MO 63867 | $62,351 |
154 | Stanley Swiney | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $61,599 |
155 | R & K Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $60,873 |
156 | Jackson D Kimes | Portageville, MO 63873 | $60,641 |
157 | Heuiser Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $60,397 |
158 | Freddie L Harris | Matthews, MO 63867 | $60,286 |
159 | Whitson Edward Henry II | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $60,274 |
160 | Hawes Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $60,146 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”