Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 288
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $936,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vernon Ray Fowler | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $10,544 |
22 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $10,122 |
23 | Hullen Driskill | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,591 |
24 | Trey Lawfield Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $9,565 |
25 | Charles Alan Newman | Hayti, MO 63851 | $9,553 |
26 | Richard And Cynthia Faulkner Dba R & C Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $8,820 |
27 | Gary Lee Kenedy | Matthews, MO 63867 | $8,548 |
28 | Henry Brands & Sons Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $8,258 |
29 | Aycorp Nm, LLC | Parma, MO 63870 | $8,171 |
30 | Tommy Lawfield Jr Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $8,048 |
31 | Ling Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $7,968 |
32 | John Paul Wescoat II | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $7,767 |
33 | Daniel Farrenburg | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $7,704 |
34 | Sarah Mann | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,660 |
35 | Sarah Lee Hunter | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $7,611 |
36 | R D James | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $7,389 |
37 | Kenny-kindle Living Kindle | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $7,257 |
38 | Hunter & Padberg Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $7,031 |
39 | Jessie Sullenger Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $6,815 |
40 | Carlisle Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $6,496 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”