Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 92
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $417,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Grape Ridge Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $6,342 |
22 | William David Rogers | Matthews, MO 63867 | $6,281 |
23 | Scott Lacewell | Malden, MO 63863 | $6,172 |
24 | Steven Wayne Landers | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $5,767 |
25 | Teddy Glen Landers | Parma, MO 63870 | $5,757 |
26 | William Lee Wescoat Jr | Matthews, MO 63867 | $5,684 |
27 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $4,877 |
28 | Julie L Aycock | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $4,877 |
29 | Danny Wayne Parker | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $4,766 |
30 | Chris & Tina Porter Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $4,613 |
31 | Billy W Harris | Matthews, MO 63867 | $3,711 |
32 | Lange Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $3,377 |
33 | Dean And Kathie Stevens Farms LLC | Malden, MO 63863 | $3,199 |
34 | Richardson Gin Inc | Marston, MO 63866 | $3,148 |
35 | Richard Andrew Weeks | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $3,103 |
36 | Jr Daniels Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $2,980 |
37 | Henry Brands & Sons Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,834 |
38 | John Barry Burnett | Campbell, MO 63933 | $2,726 |
39 | Micca Elaine Burnett | Campbell, MO 63933 | $2,726 |
40 | Francis Hulshof | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”