Emergency Conservation Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 33
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $378,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Larry Allred | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $55,576 |
2 | Robert Henry | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $42,876 |
3 | Mary M Hutchison | Perryville, MO 63775 | $40,690 |
4 | Steve Jones Farm | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $31,847 |
5 | Wanda Harlene Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $24,187 |
6 | Milus Gary Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $24,186 |
7 | John A Brewer | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $19,258 |
8 | Joe Hutchison | Perryville, MO 63775 | $18,907 |
9 | Randy Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $15,086 |
10 | Theodore W Medlin Rev Living Trus | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $14,938 |
11 | Delouri Farms Inc | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $12,733 |
12 | F S Hunter Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $10,966 |
13 | Joseph D Hunter Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $9,081 |
14 | Gary D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $7,129 |
15 | Edwards Farms Inc | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $6,498 |
16 | Sunnyside Family Partners | Nashville, TN 37221 | $6,043 |
17 | Melton Anthony Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $3,800 |
18 | Rene Dekriek Revocable Living Tru | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,543 |
19 | Darren Russell Smith | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $3,377 |
20 | Grape Ridge Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $3,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>