Farm Subsidy information
New Madrid County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,399
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $709,340,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Taylor Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $2,765,977 |
22 | Henry Brands & Sons Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,731,619 |
23 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $2,716,948 |
24 | Mike Flynn Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,613,039 |
25 | David M Barton Farms Inc | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $2,541,498 |
26 | Branum Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,489,900 |
27 | Oscar Sapp Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $2,411,965 |
28 | Two B Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,398,398 |
29 | Kevin Carlisle Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $2,380,685 |
30 | Grape Ridge Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $2,369,540 |
31 | Rick Branch Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $2,354,281 |
32 | Douglas A Scott | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,179,302 |
33 | Wub Riley Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,166,931 |
34 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,145,188 |
35 | Ryan Brandon Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,075,237 |
36 | Jessie Sullenger Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,073,556 |
37 | Martin & Karen Smelser Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $2,060,244 |
38 | Robert A Lavalle Dba Delta Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,052,859 |
39 | Elizabeth Ann Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,982,909 |
40 | Barry Richardson Sr | Marston, MO 63866 | $1,968,227 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”