Crop Disaster Assistance Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,095
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $13,204,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Henry Brands & Sons Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $209,939 |
2 | Bill Turner | Gideon, MO 63848 | $163,696 |
3 | Vernon Ray Fowler | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $149,177 |
4 | Earnest Lee Minehart | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $140,201 |
5 | Milus Gary Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $131,197 |
6 | Fletchers Gin Inc | Gideon, MO 63848 | $116,400 |
7 | Porter Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $110,621 |
8 | Michael Lynn Odom | Wardell, MO 63879 | $109,387 |
9 | Barry L Richardson Jr Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $107,310 |
10 | Hayes Farm | Marston, MO 63866 | $104,863 |
11 | Barry Richardson Sr | Marston, MO 63866 | $102,785 |
12 | Wallace M Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $97,625 |
13 | Virgil W Lawfield | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $95,218 |
14 | Charles Anthony Beis III | Portageville, MO 63873 | $91,968 |
15 | W & D Wilkins Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $91,929 |
16 | David L Hunter Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $90,158 |
17 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $87,021 |
18 | Jack Tolbert | Gideon, MO 63848 | $83,052 |
19 | Hullen Driskill | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $81,481 |
20 | J W Minehart Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $81,116 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>