Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 549
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $758,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Oscar Sapp Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $6,235 |
22 | Montgomery Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $6,145 |
23 | Hayes Farm | Marston, MO 63866 | $6,105 |
24 | Lavalle Trust No 2 | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $5,915 |
25 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $5,690 |
26 | Justin Wade Rojas | Gideon, MO 63848 | $5,645 |
27 | James L Brotherton | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $5,577 |
28 | Priggel Family Farms Inc | Portageville, MO 63873 | $5,401 |
29 | John D Palmer | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $5,252 |
30 | Lowrey Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $5,196 |
31 | Lavalle Farms Inc | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $5,130 |
32 | Charles A Earnheart Jr | Malden, MO 63863 | $4,918 |
33 | Rone Farm Partnership | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,893 |
34 | Steve & Lynn Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,855 |
35 | Elizabeth Ann Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $4,629 |
36 | Deline Farms North | Charleston, MO 63834 | $4,591 |
37 | Rost & Rost Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $4,572 |
38 | Jennings Planting Co | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $4,562 |
39 | Joe F Priggel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,537 |
40 | John Burnett Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $4,412 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”