Conservation Reserve Program in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 73
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $294,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hayes Farm | Marston, MO 63866 | $2,674 |
22 | Willow & Co | Bell City, MO 63735 | $2,136 |
23 | Betty Dewitt | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,135 |
24 | Wub Riley Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $2,112 |
25 | Nancy Riley Cravens | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,035 |
26 | Empire Land Co | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,928 |
27 | Virginia R James Childs Gst Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,905 |
28 | Sarah Riley Mann Childs Generation Skipping Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,905 |
29 | Flaire Ferrell Rev Living Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,820 |
30 | B & C Harvesting Co | Catron, MO 63833 | $1,732 |
31 | Derek B Hayes | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,627 |
32 | Adam T Hayes | Marston, MO 63866 | $1,627 |
33 | Dewitt Development LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,575 |
34 | Milus Gary Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,512 |
35 | Wanda Harlene Wallace | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,512 |
36 | James Lee Haines | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $1,482 |
37 | W V Riley Trust | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,425 |
38 | Burke Bros & Co Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,385 |
39 | Bill Haubold | Marston, MO 63866 | $1,353 |
40 | Meredith Dewitt Revocable Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,272 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”