Total Commodity Programs in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 983
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $15,412,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $126,132 |
| 22 | Ling Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $125,520 |
| 23 | Jw Sullenger Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $118,663 |
| 24 | Wub Riley Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $117,250 |
| 25 | Jacob Allan Woolverton | Gideon, MO 63848 | $114,274 |
| 26 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $113,028 |
| 27 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $110,073 |
| 28 | Grm Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $109,066 |
| 29 | B & C Klipfel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $106,371 |
| 30 | Bank Of New Madrid ** | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $99,169 |
| 31 | Steve & Lynn Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $97,197 |
| 32 | Mike Flynn Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $95,670 |
| 33 | Rost & Rost Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $95,616 |
| 34 | Albert Riley James | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $92,501 |
| 35 | Ryan Brandon Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $92,187 |
| 36 | Flatland Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $91,921 |
| 37 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $89,257 |
| 38 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $87,763 |
| 39 | Chris & Candace Sutton Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $87,710 |
| 40 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $83,312 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf