Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Newton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 99
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Newton County, Missouri totaled $311,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Timothy J Durman | Seneca, MO 64865 | $2,274 |
42 | Jeremy Mccutcheon | Rolla, MO 65401 | $2,241 |
43 | Floyd Dilbeck | Neosho, MO 64850 | $2,166 |
44 | Timothy Elbert | Seneca, MO 64865 | $2,091 |
45 | Kent A Daniels | Neosho, MO 64850 | $2,085 |
46 | Mike Turner | Sarcoxie, MO 64862 | $2,020 |
47 | Andrew D Norris | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $1,917 |
48 | Xay Vang | Fairview, MO 64842 | $1,856 |
49 | Marcus Huff | Sarcoxie, MO 64862 | $1,835 |
50 | Her Chia Hang | Fairview, MO 64842 | $1,831 |
51 | Kenneth Ritter | Seneca, MO 64865 | $1,810 |
52 | Thadd Reynolds | Wentworth, MO 64873 | $1,702 |
53 | Theodore P Dana | Sarcoxie, MO 64862 | $1,680 |
54 | Marlane K Williams | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $1,622 |
55 | Pamela Helm | Seneca, MO 64865 | $1,590 |
56 | Mark Embrey | Neosho, MO 64850 | $1,499 |
57 | Russell D Ogle | Sarcoxie, MO 64862 | $1,419 |
58 | Reiboldt Farms Inc | Neosho, MO 64850 | $1,384 |
59 | Joshua Shannon Trammell | Stark City, MO 64866 | $1,328 |
60 | Aaron Wilson | Neosho, MO 64850 | $1,237 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”