Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Newton County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 627
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Newton County, Missouri totaled $1,049,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Chazon Lee | Diamond, MO 64840 | $2,394 |
122 | Donald E Clark | Stark City, MO 64866 | $2,368 |
123 | Markus Mettlach | Stella, MO 64867 | $2,341 |
124 | Robert L Meyer | Diamond, MO 64840 | $2,298 |
125 | Jim Bradley | Diamond, MO 64840 | $2,243 |
126 | Larry Don Turner | Sarcoxie, MO 64862 | $2,238 |
127 | Charles Joseph Pearson III | Stark City, MO 64866 | $2,236 |
128 | Steven J Johnson | Diamond, MO 64840 | $2,235 |
129 | Daryle L Rhinehart | Seneca, MO 64865 | $2,224 |
130 | Randy Morgan | Stark City, MO 64866 | $2,204 |
131 | Robert D Cullers | Stella, MO 64867 | $2,192 |
132 | Tim Littlefield | Stella, MO 64867 | $2,189 |
133 | Darla J Farley | Neosho, MO 64850 | $2,182 |
134 | Jason Giebler | Neosho, MO 64850 | $2,168 |
135 | Rinehart Farms Inc | Seneca, MO 64865 | $2,165 |
136 | David Jennings | Neosho, MO 64850 | $2,160 |
137 | Ronald Wagner | Sarcoxie, MO 64862 | $2,155 |
138 | Larry E Harper | Neosho, MO 64850 | $2,130 |
139 | Darren King | Seneca, MO 64865 | $2,129 |
140 | August R Schaller | Stark City, MO 64866 | $2,118 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”