Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 759
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $7,830,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Randall Strueby | Guilford, MO 64457 | $37,219 |
22 | Turkey Creek Cattle Ranch LLC | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $36,921 |
23 | Schenkel Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $36,696 |
24 | Laughlin Angus | Guilford, MO 64457 | $36,449 |
25 | Kneale Farms Inc | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $36,094 |
26 | Robert Whipple | Pickering, MO 64476 | $36,088 |
27 | Ricky Jones | Maryville, MO 64468 | $35,587 |
28 | Frank Hoepker | Maryville, MO 64468 | $34,899 |
29 | Tracy Kim Koger | Clearmont, MO 64431 | $34,852 |
30 | Jon Holmes & Nancy Holmes Rev Liv Trust Of 4-28-06 | Graham, MO 64455 | $33,972 |
31 | Larry Joe Mitchell | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $33,642 |
32 | Charles Brand | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $33,595 |
33 | Howard Arlin Acklin | Graham, MO 64455 | $32,450 |
34 | Gerald Myers Dvm | Pickering, MO 64476 | $32,405 |
35 | Jason Gerald Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $31,663 |
36 | Richard Arlen Hanson | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $31,598 |
37 | Cris G Wilmes | Maryville, MO 64468 | $31,368 |
38 | Victor Meyer | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $31,225 |
39 | L L Hull Farms Inc | Elmo, MO 64445 | $31,221 |
40 | Jim Defreece | Maryville, MO 64468 | $31,153 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”