Counter Cyclical Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,378
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $6,983,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kirby Stiens | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $36,644 |
22 | Stephen R Alexander & Sandra S Alexander Rev Int V | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $35,362 |
23 | Robert Daniel Lager | Maryville, MO 64468 | $34,993 |
24 | Mattson Bros Inc | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $34,513 |
25 | Bj-ag-land Inc | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $34,170 |
26 | Alan Stiens | Maryville, MO 64468 | $33,470 |
27 | John L Stiens Trust Dated 12-22-9 | Maryville, MO 64468 | $33,443 |
28 | Ted Alan Wilmes | Maryville, MO 64468 | $32,684 |
29 | Marlin Francis Meyer | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $31,406 |
30 | Donald Frederick Stiens Jr | Maryville, MO 64468 | $31,375 |
31 | Paul Swartz | Graham, MO 64455 | $31,354 |
32 | J & C Barmann Farm Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $31,322 |
33 | J C Ware III | Maryville, MO 64468 | $31,231 |
34 | Matthew Gray Hess | Maryville, MO 64468 | $31,225 |
35 | G & R Meyer Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $29,964 |
36 | B & H Grain Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $29,678 |
37 | Turner Farms Inc | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $29,269 |
38 | Honan Inc | Elmo, MO 64445 | $29,017 |
39 | Gast Farms Inc | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $28,293 |
40 | Larry Rosenbohm | Graham, MO 64455 | $28,203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”