Counter Cyclical Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,378
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $6,983,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | L L Hull Farms Inc | Elmo, MO 64445 | $24,229 |
62 | L&c Stiens Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $24,110 |
63 | Eldon Davis Troth | Graham, MO 64455 | $24,070 |
64 | Eugene & Donna Frueh Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $23,847 |
65 | Mary D Maupin | Savannah, MO 64485 | $23,413 |
66 | W & I Palmer Farms Inc | Barnard, MO 64423 | $23,301 |
67 | Glenn Bix Revocable Living Trust | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $23,232 |
68 | Randy Frueh | Pickering, MO 64476 | $23,221 |
69 | Gareld D Riley | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $23,191 |
70 | Curt Hagey Farms Inc | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $22,711 |
71 | Jason Jerome Hull | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $22,617 |
72 | Rodney James Damewood | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $22,553 |
73 | Ronald Dale Howard | Clearmont, MO 64431 | $22,028 |
74 | David Burton Lewis | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $21,914 |
75 | David Ernest Evans | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $21,870 |
76 | Coleman Farms | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $21,752 |
77 | James M Fuller | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $21,734 |
78 | Roger Alan Vest | Maryville, MO 64468 | $21,626 |
79 | Felton Land Company LLC | Maryville, MO 64468 | $21,617 |
80 | John Eldon Blackford | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $21,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”