SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 328
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $6,330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Charles Fattig Farms Inc | Barnard, MO 64423 | $30,983 |
62 | Keith Edward Cassavaugh | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $30,632 |
63 | Shawn Farrell | Maryville, MO 64468 | $30,527 |
64 | Kevin Andrew Britten | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $30,317 |
65 | Stephen Francis Ginther | Maryville, MO 64468 | $28,556 |
66 | Felton Land Company LLC | Maryville, MO 64468 | $28,128 |
67 | Brian Todd Mcintyre | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $27,587 |
68 | Mary D Maupin | Savannah, MO 64485 | $26,621 |
69 | Stelter Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $25,448 |
70 | Schenkel Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $25,428 |
71 | James & Connie Colville Rl Trust | Pickering, MO 64476 | $24,668 |
72 | Mike J Walker | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $24,574 |
73 | Benny D Farrell | Maryville, MO 64468 | $24,551 |
74 | Kirby Renshaw | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $24,433 |
75 | Ben Farrell | Maryville, MO 64468 | $24,286 |
76 | Alex Maupin | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $24,109 |
77 | Eric Karl Maupin | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $24,108 |
78 | Harold H Wilmarth Trust 1996 | Maryville, MO 64468 | $23,701 |
79 | Howard Arlin Acklin | Graham, MO 64455 | $23,311 |
80 | Roger Salsbury | Guilford, MO 64457 | $23,128 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”