Counter Cyclical Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,378
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $6,983,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Edward Harold Lager | Barnard, MO 64423 | $21,429 |
82 | Kenneth E Frueh | Maryville, MO 64468 | $21,332 |
83 | Roland Barmann | Maryville, MO 64468 | $21,270 |
84 | Christopher Gerard Seipel | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $20,953 |
85 | Philip Gerard Seipel | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $20,953 |
86 | Beattie Farms Inc | Barnard, MO 64423 | $20,563 |
87 | Stelter Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $20,520 |
88 | Holly Barnes | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $20,368 |
89 | Tracy Barnes | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $20,368 |
90 | Ron Hagey | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $20,279 |
91 | Harold Hester | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $20,261 |
92 | Jerime Kent Bix | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $20,081 |
93 | William Yates Cowden | Maryville, MO 64468 | $20,034 |
94 | Mark Charles Stiens | Maryville, MO 64468 | $19,883 |
95 | Fast Farms Inc | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $19,578 |
96 | Wilmes Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $19,466 |
97 | Ronald Stiens | Maryville, MO 64468 | $19,415 |
98 | Hrs Farms Inc | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $19,236 |
99 | Gary L Adkins | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $18,977 |
100 | George David Dalbey | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $18,877 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”