Farm Subsidy information
Nodaway County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Nodaway County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,229
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $20,110,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Snyders Farm Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $22,647 |
142 | L&c Stiens Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $22,570 |
143 | Clenell Ivan Prettyman | Barnard, MO 64423 | $22,400 |
144 | Terry Owens | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $22,315 |
145 | Jared William Stiens | Barnard, MO 64423 | $22,281 |
146 | Damewood Farms Inc | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $22,216 |
147 | Rm Adkins Inc | Elmo, MO 64445 | $22,145 |
148 | Randall Martin Lyle | Holt, MO 64048 | $22,145 |
149 | David Ecker | Elmo, MO 64445 | $22,104 |
150 | Rebecca A Coenen | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $22,092 |
151 | Marvin L Luke | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $22,069 |
152 | Shane Brown Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $21,865 |
153 | Bill Henry | Clearmont, MO 64431 | $21,849 |
154 | Clinton Todd Schmitz | Parnell, MO 64475 | $21,736 |
155 | Ronald Dale Howard | Clearmont, MO 64431 | $21,641 |
156 | Gerald A Meyer Rev Liv Tr | Maryville, MO 64468 | $21,432 |
157 | Jerime Kent Bix | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $21,297 |
158 | Doris L Hagey | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $21,282 |
159 | Nolan B Thompson | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $21,274 |
160 | Kam Farms LLC | Maitland, MO 64466 | $21,255 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”