Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $1,202,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schenkel Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $180,254 |
| 2 | Tobin Brothers LLC | Pickering, MO 64476 | $177,514 |
| 3 | Randall Joseph Stoll | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $105,049 |
| 4 | Gerald Stoll Farms Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $83,576 |
| 5 | L. H. Ritterbusch & Sons Inc. | Maryville, MO 64468 | $73,028 |
| 6 | Kevin Robert Barmann | Maryville, MO 64468 | $65,969 |
| 7 | Manville Farms | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $54,506 |
| 8 | Larry Rosenbohm | Graham, MO 64455 | $39,551 |
| 9 | Ritterbusch Grain Inc | Clearmont, MO 64431 | $38,426 |
| 10 | Rm Adkins Inc | Elmo, MO 64445 | $36,202 |
| 11 | Robert Daniel Lager | Maryville, MO 64468 | $35,500 |
| 12 | M & M Barmann Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $30,460 |
| 13 | Raymond Francis Jermain | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $28,512 |
| 14 | Wayne Wilson Rl Trust Of 10-1-97 | Parnell, MO 64475 | $25,835 |
| 15 | Andrew B Pride And Joyce K Pride Rlt - Andrew B Pr | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $23,019 |
| 16 | Wayne Wilson Rev Liv Trust | Parnell, MO 64475 | $20,024 |
| 17 | Jason Gerald Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $19,935 |
| 18 | Donald G Seipel | Maryville, MO 64468 | $19,507 |
| 19 | Gregory N Adkins | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $19,057 |
| 20 | Stelter Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $14,463 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf