Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,236
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $16,509,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nodaway Valley Bank ** | Maryville, MO 64468 | $605,226 |
| 2 | Brown & Brown Farms Enterprises, Inc | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $221,829 |
| 3 | Matthew Gray Hess | Maryville, MO 64468 | $205,073 |
| 4 | Jerry Brown Inc | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $196,810 |
| 5 | Troy Renshaw Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $193,176 |
| 6 | K & J Renshaw Inc | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $180,353 |
| 7 | Wiederholt Brothers Inc | Bolckow, MO 64427 | $155,436 |
| 8 | Stelter Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $150,073 |
| 9 | Mattson Bros Inc | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $133,030 |
| 10 | Tobin Brothers LLC | Pickering, MO 64476 | $130,836 |
| 11 | Schenkel Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $122,489 |
| 12 | K And R Land And Livestock, Inc. | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $109,877 |
| 13 | J & C Barmann Farm Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $106,116 |
| 14 | 102 River Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $95,968 |
| 15 | Randall Joseph Stoll | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $95,903 |
| 16 | R & W Farms General Partnership | Graham, MO 64455 | $95,237 |
| 17 | Nicholas T Barmann & Cherlyn S Barmann Rlt 7-18-11 | Maryville, MO 64468 | $95,021 |
| 18 | Stiens Grain & Livestock Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $94,708 |
| 19 | Curt Hagey Farms Inc | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $94,591 |
| 20 | Turner Farms Inc | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $89,932 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf