Conservation Reserve Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 420
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $3,671,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bluestem Prairie Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $30,990 |
22 | Bifford C Harden | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $30,718 |
23 | Ladonna Blackford | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $29,767 |
24 | Roger Frueh | Pickering, MO 64476 | $28,816 |
25 | Margaret Ann Merrick Rev Tr | Clarinda, IA 51632 | $28,036 |
26 | Kirby Greeley | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $27,917 |
27 | Lucretia Hartman | Trimble, MO 64492 | $27,719 |
28 | Matthew Gray Hess | Maryville, MO 64468 | $27,492 |
29 | Melvin L Gibson Rev Trust | Maryville, MO 64468 | $27,296 |
30 | Darrell Harvey | Elmo, MO 64445 | $26,964 |
31 | Wolbert & Wolbert LLC | Maryville, MO 64468 | $26,829 |
32 | Robert A Stiens &joyce E Stiens Rev Liv Tr 3-31-08 | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $26,049 |
33 | Gerald N Moore Irrv Trust | Kansas City, MO 64156 | $25,777 |
34 | Michael Wells | Guilford, MO 64457 | $25,102 |
35 | West Jackson Ranch LLC | Kansas City, MO 64108 | $24,170 |
36 | Maureen Wolf | Houston, TX 77074 | $24,060 |
37 | Raymond Frueh | Maryville, MO 64468 | $23,745 |
38 | Rose M Frueh | Maryville, MO 64468 | $23,745 |
39 | Joe Baumli | Maryville, MO 64468 | $23,311 |
40 | Jeffry P Gardner | Maryville, MO 64468 | $22,330 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”