Total Emergency Relief Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 66
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $608,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cody Wacha | Barnard, MO 64423 | $66,451 |
2 | Nicholas T Barmann & Cherlyn S Barmann Rlt 7-18-11 | Maryville, MO 64468 | $54,920 |
3 | Brandon David Wolf | Barnard, MO 64423 | $47,589 |
4 | Nathan Adam Prettyman | Barnard, MO 64423 | $46,402 |
5 | Keith R Gross | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $31,184 |
6 | Patrick E Joslin | Maryville, MO 64468 | $25,439 |
7 | Vernon Glenn Nielson | Barnard, MO 64423 | $25,394 |
8 | Kevin Robert Barmann | Maryville, MO 64468 | $24,990 |
9 | Hazel Hester | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $24,417 |
10 | Roger Salsbury | Guilford, MO 64457 | $17,801 |
11 | Beattie Farms Inc | Barnard, MO 64423 | $15,316 |
12 | Thomas James Workman | Maryville, MO 64468 | $14,829 |
13 | James Price | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $11,582 |
14 | Palmer Land Holdings LLC | Bolckow, MO 64427 | $10,719 |
15 | Edwin G Henggeler Revocable Trust | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $10,363 |
16 | David Palmer Farms Inc | Bolckow, MO 64427 | $9,519 |
17 | William Keith Beggs | Darlington, MO 64438 | $9,498 |
18 | Wayne E Jenson | Maryville, MO 64468 | $9,101 |
19 | Damian Auffert | Parnell, MO 64475 | $8,636 |
20 | Nathan David Palmer | Maryville, MO 64468 | $8,596 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>