Market Gains in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 202
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $2,240,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Randy Duane Mccollam | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $26,313 |
22 | Charles Larry Mcintyre | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $26,036 |
23 | Richard A & Darlene Wilmes Rev Li | Guilford, MO 64457 | $25,107 |
24 | Ronald Dale Howard | Clearmont, MO 64431 | $24,341 |
25 | Carol L Skoglund | Barnard, MO 64423 | $24,200 |
26 | Kelly Russell Morrison | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $23,115 |
27 | Donald Leon Adwell | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $22,302 |
28 | Robert Joseph Wiederholt | Maryville, MO 64468 | $21,437 |
29 | Keeran Christiansen Pedersen | Guilford, MO 64457 | $20,970 |
30 | David Burton Lewis | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $20,953 |
31 | Jerime Kent Bix | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $20,852 |
32 | Beattie Farms Inc | Barnard, MO 64423 | $19,244 |
33 | Gary L Ecker Rl Trust Of 11-1-94 | Elmo, MO 64445 | $18,758 |
34 | William Joseph Schafer | Maryville, MO 64468 | $18,210 |
35 | Wiederholt Brothers Inc | Bolckow, MO 64427 | $18,058 |
36 | James Everett Miller | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $18,003 |
37 | Charles Fattig Farms Inc | Barnard, MO 64423 | $17,470 |
38 | Frank Morgan | Maryville, MO 64468 | $17,300 |
39 | Gibson Family Partnership L P | Maryville, MO 64468 | $17,035 |
40 | Mark Allen Beattie | Bolckow, MO 64427 | $17,027 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”