Production Flexibility Program in Nodaway County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,774
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $21,653,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Harold Hester | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $90,799 |
22 | Tracy Barnes | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $90,126 |
23 | Charles Fattig Farms Inc | Barnard, MO 64423 | $87,471 |
24 | Schenkel Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $87,001 |
25 | Medsker Farms Inc | Graham, MO 64455 | $86,998 |
26 | Marvin L Luke | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $85,092 |
27 | Jerry Lynn Kenny | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $84,077 |
28 | Coleman Farms | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $83,860 |
29 | Stephen R Alexander & Sandra S Alexander Rev Int V | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $83,115 |
30 | Bobby Hagey | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $82,621 |
31 | James Barcus | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $79,879 |
32 | Hrs Farms Inc | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $78,170 |
33 | Paul Swartz | Graham, MO 64455 | $76,778 |
34 | Randall Joseph Stoll | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $76,467 |
35 | Mary D Maupin | Savannah, MO 64485 | $76,394 |
36 | Joe Giesken | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $76,298 |
37 | Max Akin | Graham, MO 64455 | $76,030 |
38 | Marlin Francis Meyer | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $75,799 |
39 | Ronald Dale Howard | Clearmont, MO 64431 | $75,652 |
40 | Gerald A Meyer Rev Liv Tr | Maryville, MO 64468 | $74,869 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”