Total Commodity Programs in Nodaway County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,165
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Nodaway County, Missouri totaled $22,100,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fcs Financial ** | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $94,972 |
42 | Ecker Farms, Inc. | Elmo, MO 64445 | $94,504 |
43 | William J Schafer & Dorothy L Schafer Rev Liv Tr | Maryville, MO 64468 | $93,637 |
44 | Honan Inc | Elmo, MO 64445 | $93,631 |
45 | 102 River Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $91,604 |
46 | Randall Joseph Stoll | Conception Junction, MO 64434 | $91,319 |
47 | Duane Frueh | Pickering, MO 64476 | $91,213 |
48 | Robert Daniel Lager | Maryville, MO 64468 | $89,242 |
49 | R & W Farms General Partnership | Graham, MO 64455 | $88,470 |
50 | Richard Arlen Hanson | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $88,312 |
51 | Cody Del Parman | Barnard, MO 64423 | $88,247 |
52 | Ronald Lynn Balle | Burlington Junction, MO 64428 | $88,038 |
53 | L L Hull Farms Inc | Elmo, MO 64445 | $88,015 |
54 | L. H. Ritterbusch & Sons Inc. | Maryville, MO 64468 | $84,881 |
55 | M & M Barmann Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $84,608 |
56 | J & C Barmann Farm Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $84,036 |
57 | Ben Eugene Greeley | Maryville, MO 64468 | $82,511 |
58 | Keith Edward Cassavaugh | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $82,126 |
59 | L&c Stiens Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $81,683 |
60 | D&t Stiens Farms Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $81,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”