Farm Subsidy information
Osage County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Osage County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,972
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Osage County, Missouri totaled $59,281,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Stuecken Brothers LLC | Freeburg, MO 65035 | $90,137 |
102 | Locks Mill, LLC | Loose Creek, MO 65054 | $89,846 |
103 | Mark C Loehner | Koeltztown, MO 65048 | $89,828 |
104 | Dan Billington | Chamois, MO 65024 | $88,933 |
105 | Kenneth Francis Rost Sr | Chamois, MO 65024 | $88,750 |
106 | Herbert Kramer | Linn, MO 65051 | $87,293 |
107 | Ted P Neuner | Linn, MO 65051 | $87,108 |
108 | Robert A Haller | Freeburg, MO 65035 | $86,978 |
109 | Derek J Groene | Argyle, MO 65001 | $86,848 |
110 | Vincent Falter | Freeburg, MO 65035 | $86,841 |
111 | Charles Schwartz | Freeburg, MO 65035 | $85,384 |
112 | Kary H Wolfe | Linn, MO 65051 | $84,758 |
113 | Maxine Thomas | Belle, MO 65013 | $83,967 |
114 | Circle 7 Ranch LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63131 | $81,652 |
115 | Leroy Douglas Butler | Belle, MO 65013 | $81,325 |
116 | Robert F Sundermeyer | Chamois, MO 65024 | $81,144 |
117 | Matthew J Fick | Chamois, MO 65024 | $81,058 |
118 | William R Folk | Columbia, MO 65203 | $80,950 |
119 | Kenneth F Butler | Belle, MO 65013 | $80,647 |
120 | Philip J Luebbering | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $79,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”