Farm Subsidy information
Osage County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Osage County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,972
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Osage County, Missouri totaled $59,281,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paulsmeyer Farms Inc | Chamois, MO 65024 | $1,421,184 |
| 2 | David Edward Troesser | Bonnots Mill, MO 65016 | $1,006,112 |
| 3 | Carl David Troesser | Bonnots Mill, MO 65016 | $694,473 |
| 4 | Kent Albert Kuschel | Chamois, MO 65024 | $677,854 |
| 5 | Douglas Arthur Lieneke | Morrison, MO 65061 | $607,685 |
| 6 | Karl Reuben Kuschel | Chamois, MO 65024 | $602,395 |
| 7 | Thomas Wayne Starke | Chamois, MO 65024 | $547,397 |
| 8 | Sean Hackmann | Chamois, MO 65024 | $534,962 |
| 9 | Keith E Neier | Linn, MO 65051 | $521,492 |
| 10 | Alfred James Brandt | Linn, MO 65051 | $520,516 |
| 11 | Trachsel Farms Inc | Chamois, MO 65024 | $503,220 |
| 12 | Deeken Farms | Linn, MO 65051 | $461,093 |
| 13 | James R Hurst | Meta, MO 65058 | $424,606 |
| 14 | Glen Alan Henneke | Linn, MO 65051 | $394,883 |
| 15 | Stephen C Winkelman | Freeburg, MO 65035 | $358,098 |
| 16 | Gregory A Peters | Bonnots Mill, MO 65016 | $356,675 |
| 17 | Leonard Keilholz | Chamois, MO 65024 | $341,277 |
| 18 | Stephen J Berhorst | Westphalia, MO 65085 | $334,229 |
| 19 | Pine Valley Farms LLC | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $304,468 |
| 20 | Ralph Hugo Brandt | Linn, MO 65051 | $301,881 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
