Loan Deficiency in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,712
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $37,464,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | George William Merrell Iv | Hayti, MO 63851 | $208,505 |
42 | Earl Carter | Steele, MO 63877 | $208,273 |
43 | Joe Tidwell Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $204,334 |
44 | Gregory Wilson Duffy | Hayti, MO 63851 | $203,441 |
45 | Lee Dorroh | Hayti, MO 63851 | $202,975 |
46 | Jimmy R And Patricia Marchbanks Ab Living Tr | Kennett, MO 63857 | $201,847 |
47 | Ronnie W Thomas | Hayti, MO 63851 | $198,382 |
48 | Powell Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $183,512 |
49 | Stephen Flake Mckaskle | Braggadocio, MO 63826 | $180,199 |
50 | Watkins Farms Inc | Hayti, MO 63851 | $176,626 |
51 | Jerry Louis Maclin | Hayti, MO 63851 | $174,486 |
52 | David Bond Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $173,973 |
53 | Reid Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $169,639 |
54 | Massey Farms Inc | Hayti, MO 63851 | $168,816 |
55 | Burton Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $168,767 |
56 | Gary Royal Sanders | Steele, MO 63877 | $166,721 |
57 | Larry W Spencer | Portageville, MO 63873 | $165,855 |
58 | Truman Larue | Steele, MO 63877 | $165,404 |
59 | T R Cole And Sons Inc | Hayti, MO 63851 | $162,343 |
60 | Bruton Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $161,341 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”