Farm Subsidy information
Pemiscot County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,473
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $484,359,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Carles Arbuckle III | Wardell, MO 63879 | $1,298,017 |
62 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,294,552 |
63 | Powell Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $1,288,537 |
64 | Wendell And Pat Hoskins Farms Partnership | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,275,734 |
65 | Stephen And Lori Watkins Farm Partn | Hayti, MO 63851 | $1,260,469 |
66 | Zachary Daniel Stevens | Hayti, MO 63851 | $1,229,840 |
67 | Larry W Spencer | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,228,552 |
68 | Jason & Otto Bean Partnership | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $1,223,098 |
69 | Worrell Farms Partnership | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,210,554 |
70 | Reid Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,186,865 |
71 | Troma Eugene Jones | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $1,180,219 |
72 | Vernon Dewayne Williams | Wardell, MO 63879 | $1,178,225 |
73 | Dennis Riley Hayes | Braggadocio, MO 63826 | $1,177,676 |
74 | Danny Stevens Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $1,174,586 |
75 | Gream Farms Inc | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,169,673 |
76 | Jimmy Ray Williams | Wardell, MO 63879 | $1,154,475 |
77 | Harris Brothers Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,129,142 |
78 | First Missouri Bank Of Semo ** | Kennett, MO 63857 | $1,116,009 |
79 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,102,267 |
80 | Witt Smith Farms Partnership | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $1,099,910 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”