Farm Subsidy information
Pemiscot County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,030
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $17,405,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Vernon Dewayne Williams | Wardell, MO 63879 | $43,960 |
62 | Charles E Cain Sr | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $43,806 |
63 | William Jason Lamar | Portageville, MO 63873 | $43,483 |
64 | Collin Strother Farms LLC | Kennett, MO 63857 | $43,340 |
65 | C & M Farm Partnership | Hayti, MO 63851 | $42,361 |
66 | Stephen Earl Atwill | Kennett, MO 63857 | $41,652 |
67 | Dennis Riley Hayes | Braggadocio, MO 63826 | $41,373 |
68 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $41,364 |
69 | Danny Glass | Wardell, MO 63879 | $40,815 |
70 | T R Cole And Sons Inc | Hayti, MO 63851 | $39,892 |
71 | Witt Smith Farms Partnership | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $39,701 |
72 | Billy Powell | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $39,507 |
73 | Zachary Daniel Stevens | Hayti, MO 63851 | $39,406 |
74 | David Bond Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $37,771 |
75 | Merideth Farms Inc | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $37,547 |
76 | Tipton And Madison Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $37,412 |
77 | Gregory Wilson Duffy | Hayti, MO 63851 | $37,096 |
78 | Scotty Ray Marchbanks | Kennett, MO 63857 | $36,322 |
79 | Cathy Jo Bradford | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $35,684 |
80 | Randy Myron Bradford | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $35,551 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”