Total Commodity Programs in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,428

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $366,745,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
61Worrell Farms PartnershipSteele, MO 63877$1,192,569
62Zachary Daniel StevensHayti, MO 63851$1,186,974
63Larry W SpencerPortageville, MO 63873$1,175,595
64Reid FarmsSteele, MO 63877$1,175,296
65Wendell And Pat Hoskins Farms PartnershipSteele, MO 63877$1,165,456
66Bean Farms PartnershipGideon, MO 63848$1,163,146
67Gream Farms IncPortageville, MO 63873$1,160,656
68Troma Eugene JonesCaruthersville, MO 63830$1,139,455
69Danny Stevens FarmsHayti, MO 63851$1,131,580
70Jason & Otto Bean PartnershipHolcomb, MO 63852$1,120,429
71First Missouri Bank Of Semo **Kennett, MO 63857$1,116,009
72Wendell HoskinsSteele, MO 63877$1,111,942
73Vernon Dewayne WilliamsWardell, MO 63879$1,108,271
74Farm Credit Southeast Missouri **Poplar Bluff, MO 63901$1,102,267
75Jimmy Ray WilliamsWardell, MO 63879$1,083,457
76Witt Smith Farms PartnershipBlytheville, AR 72315$1,080,649
77Harris Brothers FarmsSteele, MO 63877$1,076,838
78Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$1,063,589
79Reid FarmsSteele, MO 63877$1,057,642
80John Carles Arbuckle IIIWardell, MO 63879$1,048,788

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag