Total Commodity Programs in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,016
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $11,879,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Collin Strother Farms LLC | Kennett, MO 63857 | $43,340 |
62 | C & M Farm Partnership | Hayti, MO 63851 | $42,361 |
63 | Vernon Dewayne Williams | Wardell, MO 63879 | $42,064 |
64 | Stephen Earl Atwill | Kennett, MO 63857 | $41,652 |
65 | William Jason Lamar | Portageville, MO 63873 | $41,425 |
66 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $41,364 |
67 | T R Cole And Sons Inc | Hayti, MO 63851 | $39,892 |
68 | Billy Powell | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $39,507 |
69 | Zachary Daniel Stevens | Hayti, MO 63851 | $39,255 |
70 | Danny Glass | Wardell, MO 63879 | $38,831 |
71 | Witt Smith Farms Partnership | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $38,455 |
72 | David Bond Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $37,771 |
73 | Merideth Farms Inc | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $37,547 |
74 | Tipton And Madison Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $37,412 |
75 | Scotty Ray Marchbanks | Kennett, MO 63857 | $36,322 |
76 | Cathy Jo Bradford | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $35,684 |
77 | Randy Myron Bradford | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $35,551 |
78 | Danny Stevens Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $35,439 |
79 | Robert Dale Pike | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $34,096 |
80 | Elizabeth Dorroh | Hayti, MO 63851 | $33,223 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”