Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 796
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $2,413,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jason Kyle Bradford | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $7,846 |
82 | Brandon Allen Irions | Finley, TN 38030 | $7,581 |
83 | Steve Golden Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $7,498 |
84 | William Jason Lamar | Portageville, MO 63873 | $7,383 |
85 | Bracey Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $7,337 |
86 | Zachary Daniel Stevens | Hayti, MO 63851 | $7,189 |
87 | Kristi Renee Stevens | Hayti, MO 63851 | $7,189 |
88 | John William Sanders III | Hayti, MO 63851 | $7,157 |
89 | Henson Family Farms LLC | Murray, KY 42071 | $7,128 |
90 | W & D Wilkins Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $7,019 |
91 | Christopher Toby Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $6,905 |
92 | Kelli Leigh Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $6,902 |
93 | Jackie Pery | Steele, MO 63877 | $6,864 |
94 | Billy Powell | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $6,862 |
95 | Dean Flay Wilson | Wardell, MO 63879 | $6,751 |
96 | Gail Berry | Nashville, TN 37205 | $6,735 |
97 | Mitchell Fisher | Steele, MO 63877 | $6,350 |
98 | Mccrate Farms Corp | Portageville, MO 63873 | $6,035 |
99 | Jewell Burgess Revocable Trust U/a/d 10/27/1999 | Portageville, MO 63873 | $5,926 |
100 | Joe Tidwell Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $5,742 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”