Market Gains in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 833
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $11,486,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Phillips Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $31,224 |
82 | Joe Tucker | Kennett, MO 63857 | $30,888 |
83 | Howard Smith | Steele, MO 63877 | $30,813 |
84 | Duane Eftink Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $30,810 |
85 | J & S Brents Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $30,773 |
86 | Joe F Priggel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $30,203 |
87 | J And D Palmer Farms | Wardell, MO 63879 | $29,866 |
88 | Gary Royal Sanders | Steele, MO 63877 | $29,247 |
89 | S O S Farms | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $28,881 |
90 | Deborah Alexander Sanders | Steele, MO 63877 | $28,550 |
91 | William Danny Medlin | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $28,281 |
92 | Malin & Malin Farms | Campbell, MO 63933 | $28,010 |
93 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $26,709 |
94 | Don E And Sherry D Hastings Ptrs | Finley, TN 38030 | $26,067 |
95 | David Haggard | Steele, MO 63877 | $26,007 |
96 | David E Kelley Sr | Mountain Home, AR 72653 | $24,901 |
97 | Gary Bruton Farms Inc | Holland, MO 63853 | $23,996 |
98 | Keith Dwight Emmons Sr | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $23,697 |
99 | Donald F Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $23,451 |
100 | Melinda Berry Porter | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $23,419 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”