Cotton Ginning Program in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 267
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $1,935,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | M L Conn Properties LLC | Calvert City, KY 42029 | $1,335 |
102 | Annie Sides Estate | Rolla, MO 65401 | $1,329 |
103 | Harold E Jackson Family Trust | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,306 |
104 | Avis Lucille Smith Rev Trust | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,302 |
105 | Lettie Lorene Grable | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $1,268 |
106 | Mckeown Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $1,240 |
107 | O Wayne Myracle Estate | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,140 |
108 | Clara Elizabeth Myracle Estate | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $1,140 |
109 | George M Cook | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $1,136 |
110 | David E Gilbert | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,120 |
111 | Garrett Trust | Marion, AR 72364 | $1,101 |
112 | Frances J Moody | Bartlett, TN 38133 | $1,101 |
113 | Martha M Paridy Family Trust | West Hartford, CT 06110 | $1,101 |
114 | Sugar Ridge Properties | Hayti, MO 63851 | $1,084 |
115 | The Elmer Leonard Nowlin Trust | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,077 |
116 | Helen Pauline Nowlin Living Trust | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,077 |
117 | Hayward Ridge Farms LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,060 |
118 | Roger Hurley | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $1,048 |
119 | Tonie Waller | Ada, OK 74820 | $1,032 |
120 | Justin L Rone Rev Trust | Portageville, MO 63873 | $1,028 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”