Market Gains in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 833
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $11,486,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Burton Land Co | Steele, MO 63877 | $16,451 |
122 | Paul Emmons | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $16,416 |
123 | Anderson Farms Inc | Gideon, MO 63848 | $16,224 |
124 | Scott Fullerton | Portageville, MO 63873 | $15,723 |
125 | Marilyn Atwill | Deering, MO 63840 | $15,684 |
126 | Avis Samford Family Trust 2010 | Steele, MO 63877 | $15,510 |
127 | Kersey Farms Inc | Memphis, TN 38117 | $15,411 |
128 | Rickie Branch | Gideon, MO 63848 | $15,127 |
129 | Reid Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $14,514 |
130 | A J And Lavennia Earls Farms | Kennett, MO 63857 | $14,449 |
131 | Ted Rouse | Kennett, MO 63857 | $14,425 |
132 | Worrell Farms - Deleted | Hornersville, MO 63855 | $14,178 |
133 | Robert George Spencer | Memphis, TN 38117 | $14,113 |
134 | Truman Larue | Steele, MO 63877 | $14,106 |
135 | Blake Robinson | Steele, MO 63877 | $14,032 |
136 | Donald Rone Sr Trust | Portageville, MO 63873 | $13,915 |
137 | Jimmie Dean Strother Trust | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $13,879 |
138 | Jerry Stillman | Kennett, MO 63857 | $13,780 |
139 | William F Barger | Steele, MO 63877 | $13,236 |
140 | Dale Lybarger Oil Co Inc | Panama City Beach, FL 32408 | $13,133 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”