Production Flexibility Program in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,753
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $40,085,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John L Sanders | Kennett, MO 63857 | $86,018 |
122 | Michael Maurice Avis | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $85,444 |
123 | Michael S Bernard | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $84,028 |
124 | Brown Brothers Farms | Kennett, MO 63857 | $83,700 |
125 | Lawrence Little | Cooter, MO 63839 | $82,428 |
126 | Thomas Gerald Lindsey | Paragould, AR 72450 | $81,301 |
127 | Dixie Sam Reed | Hayti, MO 63851 | $81,032 |
128 | Bobby Battles Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $80,455 |
129 | Helen Vickrey Rutledge Rev Tr | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $80,073 |
130 | Ronnie W Thomas | Hayti, MO 63851 | $79,859 |
131 | Kenneth Berry Jr | Nashville, TN 37205 | $79,531 |
132 | Therron Lenard Nowlin | Steele, MO 63877 | $79,510 |
133 | John Lanier Pierce | Kennett, MO 63857 | $79,268 |
134 | Vernon Dewayne Williams | Wardell, MO 63879 | $78,984 |
135 | Jimmy Ray Williams | Wardell, MO 63879 | $78,964 |
136 | Jimmie Hooper Morton | Steele, MO 63877 | $78,715 |
137 | Thomas Eual Duncan | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $78,438 |
138 | Joseph Bailey Rutledge | Memphis, TN 38117 | $77,945 |
139 | George Cain | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $77,871 |
140 | Sonnie Robert Welch | Wardell, MO 63879 | $77,634 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”