Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 796
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $2,413,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Marilyn Atwill | Deering, MO 63840 | $3,577 |
142 | Keith Dwight Emmons Jr | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $3,448 |
143 | Troma Eugene Jones | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $3,431 |
144 | John M Alford | Collierville, TN 38017 | $3,427 |
145 | Barrett Farms Prtsp | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $3,408 |
146 | Kerry Bert Brents | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $3,343 |
147 | Terry Scott Farms Partnership | Gobler, MO 63849 | $3,339 |
148 | Avis Samford Family Trust Agreement 2020 | Steele, MO 63877 | $3,277 |
149 | Dunavant Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $3,248 |
150 | Kenneth Wayne Palmer | Hayti, MO 63851 | $3,205 |
151 | George William Ramey | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $3,187 |
152 | Sah Farm, LLC | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $3,179 |
153 | Nelson Ag | Blytheville, AR 72316 | $3,158 |
154 | Shawn Nowlin | Steele, MO 63877 | $3,114 |
155 | Eugene E Reeves | Finley, TN 38030 | $3,097 |
156 | Rex Keller Jr | Dexter, MO 63841 | $3,089 |
157 | Charles Alan Newman | Hayti, MO 63851 | $3,062 |
158 | Tapian Reeves | Finley, TN 38030 | $3,061 |
159 | Thomas E Fisher | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,992 |
160 | S O S Farms | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $2,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”