Farm Subsidy information
Pemiscot County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,081
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $28,287,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael A Tidwell | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $202,486 |
22 | S & L Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $198,605 |
23 | First State Community Bank ** | Malden, MO 63863 | $195,953 |
24 | Kris Robinson Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $194,724 |
25 | Wendell And Gayla Hoskins Farms Partnership | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $190,281 |
26 | Wendell And Pat Hoskins Farms Partnership | Steele, MO 63877 | $189,398 |
27 | Kara Woods Still | Steele, MO 63877 | $189,365 |
28 | D-m-b Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $179,592 |
29 | Sides Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $167,786 |
30 | Gregory Wilson Duffy | Hayti, MO 63851 | $164,215 |
31 | James Raulerson | Holland, MO 63853 | $157,083 |
32 | Michael Bernard Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $153,788 |
33 | Reid Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $142,811 |
34 | David Haggard | Steele, MO 63877 | $139,841 |
35 | Tims Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $133,521 |
36 | Malinda K Harris | Kennett, MO 63857 | $133,130 |
37 | Massey Farms Inc | Hayti, MO 63851 | $131,776 |
38 | David Bond Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $131,416 |
39 | Anthony Hayes & Gary Hayes Ptr | Portageville, MO 63873 | $129,031 |
40 | Dolphin Land Co | Steele, MO 63877 | $125,569 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”