Loan Deficiency in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,712
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $37,464,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James T Streete | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $267,627 |
22 | Witt Smith Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $260,456 |
23 | Luye Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $259,180 |
24 | Harris Brothers Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $255,126 |
25 | Sides Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $254,526 |
26 | Brian Gene Irions | Hayti, MO 63851 | $254,166 |
27 | Paul Wayne Maclin | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $253,692 |
28 | Stephen Earl Atwill | Kennett, MO 63857 | $250,000 |
29 | O H Acom Farms Inc | Wardell, MO 63879 | $249,916 |
30 | Southern Farm Co Inc | Steele, MO 63877 | $248,180 |
31 | Donald Rone Sr Trust | Portageville, MO 63873 | $242,949 |
32 | Mehrle Farms Inc | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $234,170 |
33 | Tipton And Madison Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $223,524 |
34 | James Raulerson | Holland, MO 63853 | $218,904 |
35 | Danny Stevens No | Hayti, MO 63851 | $218,320 |
36 | Troma Eugene Jones | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $217,933 |
37 | Jason & Otto Bean Partnership | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $216,108 |
38 | Gream Farms Inc | Portageville, MO 63873 | $214,168 |
39 | Turnage Farms | Hayti, MO 63851 | $213,885 |
40 | Billy S Jean | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $212,745 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”