Deficiency Payment in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 653
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $844,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Meyer Farm Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $6,159 |
22 | David Allen Guier | Warsaw, MO 65355 | $5,943 |
23 | Selken Farms | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $5,443 |
24 | Robert Cranfill | Smithton, MO 65350 | $5,398 |
25 | Larry C Callis | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $5,380 |
26 | John M Chamberlin | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $5,363 |
27 | Tom Smith Higgins | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $5,104 |
28 | Thomas R Parsons Tyler | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $5,091 |
29 | Jones Bros Farms Inc | La Monte, MO 65337 | $5,085 |
30 | William Pointer | Marshall, MO 65340 | $4,977 |
31 | Larry D Wilson Farms Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $4,852 |
32 | William Nathan Taylor | La Monte, MO 65337 | $4,830 |
33 | John W Stuhner Trust | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $4,691 |
34 | O-rich Dairy | Mora, MO 65345 | $4,676 |
35 | Michael J Carter | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $4,632 |
36 | Gregory Farms | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $4,612 |
37 | Timothy Oscar Knoernschild | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $4,601 |
38 | Ricky Allen Cunningham | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $4,554 |
39 | Carrol Dean Guier Revocable Trust | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $4,485 |
40 | Keith Edward Minor | La Monte, MO 65337 | $4,387 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”